Friday, February 15, 2013

Can you increase intelligence?


 When answering this question we must first be careful to define just what it is we mean by intelligence. Different definitions and interpretations are discussed in an earlier post; What is Intelligence.  
After all under the most general definitions, it is clearly possible to improve intelligence. Why did we spend so much time at school if we were not able to improve our ability to learn and solve problems.

In the g factor model of intelligence, these kinds of abilities that it is intuitively obvious can be improved through study, are grouped together under Crystallized Intelligence (Gc). But what about the other key aspect, Fluid Intelligence (Gf), is it also possible for an individual to increase their natural ability to solve novel problems independent on any relevant knowledge or experience they may have.

For most of human history, in fact right up to the end of the twentieth century, it was widely believed throughout scientific and academic communities that it was impossible for someone to increase this kind of intelligence. This was due to the idea that the fundamental characteristics of fluid intelligence were determined by genetic factors.

Increasing evidence from the last two decades has been challenging that point of view, and today there is widespread support for the idea that it is possible to improve Gf.

 At the statistical level, concerning general populations, it appears it is happening naturally. Since the 1980s researchers have repeatedly measured the Flynn effect. Named after James Flynn following his 1987 publication, ‘Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: What IQ tests really measure’, the Flynn effect is the apparent gradually increase in a populations IQ, averaging around 3 IQ points per decade.  

There are many different explanations for this effect, from improved nutrition, more test aware children, to more stimulating environments. None of these explanation can conclusively demonstrate it alone is responsible, and it is entirely possible a more complex interaction of these and more factors combine to give improved IQ score. What is clear, is the effect is real; the increase is consistently seen in populations from all across the globe.  

For the time being let us leave the gradual statistical march of IQ scores, and turn our attention to the individual, as this may have a far greater significance on our understanding of intelligence. Is it possible for a person to make a noticeable improvement in their own intelligence?

Developments in neuroscience are repeatedly demonstrating the phenomenal plasticity of the human brain. Studies such as; ‘Neuroplasticity: Changes in grey matter induced by training’ by Draganski et al, have shown that mentally stimulating training induces selective structural changes within the brain. These changes in turn improve the mental processing associated with a particular skills or ability.


Are these structural changes in the brain useful for improving Gf?

The key in the search for a training regimen that would allow an individual to improve their intelligence is that any gains they make must be transferrable. A wide variety of ‘Brain Training’ games and activities have been put examined, and unfortunately the results have not been promising. Owen et al, summarised their finding in ‘Putting brain training to the test’, as “Although improvements were observed in every one of the cognitive tasks that were trained, no evidence was found for transfer effects to untrained tasks, even when those tasks were cognitively closely related”.

Although this finding is repeatedly reinforced for the vast majority of brain training exercises, it appears not all brain training games are created equal. In 2008, Suzanne Jaeggi, Martin Buschkuehl,
John Jonides, and Walter Perrig. published their study Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. They showed, using a particular cognitive training exercise known as Dual N-Back, that participants could through developing their working memory, achieve a lasting and transferrable increase in their fluid intelligence.

The findings of Jaeggi’s study have since been replicated. The success of these studies suggests a new approach; perhaps certain mental attributes like working memory formed a foundation to Gf. By improving these, individuals would also experience a knock on improvement in Gf.

More exercises that improve working memory have now been discovered, and further candidates for foundational attributes that underlie fluid intelligence have also been identified. Although the field is still in its infancy, there can now be little doubt, it is possible for people to increase their intelligence.

Monday, February 4, 2013

What is Intelligence?


Intelligence has been a remarkably difficult concept to pin down in any kind of robust and reliable way.  It often falls into that elusive category of ‘things we know exactly what they are until someone asks us for a definition’. Because of this there are many competing conceptions. The definition below is a synthesis of many of these different ideas.

Intelligence is our set of general problem solving skills. It includes cognitive abilities such as reasoning, identifying patterns and relationships, judgement, calculation, evaluation, and an ability to acquire new knowledge and skills.

An important aspect of most definitions seems to be that intelligence is not something related to our existing knowledge or particular skills we have developed but rather a general problem solving trait for novel situations. Perhaps this idea is best captured in the phrase; “Intelligence is what you do when you don’t know what to do”

Part of the problem in attempting to find a consensus on the definition of intelligence is there is no universally accepted theory of intelligence.  

Single or Multiple Intelligences?

One of the key questions in the search for a theory of intelligence is; ‘Do we possess a single attribute that could be defined as our intelligence, or are there in fact many entirely different types of intelligence?

If our intelligence can be expressed as a single attribute, can that attribute be divided into different aspects of intelligence? If so how are these different aspects related, and do they overlap? If, alternatively there are many different intelligences, how do we account for the high degree of correlation we find on many test scores that measure supposedly different cognitive skills?

Theories of Intelligence

There have been many different theories of intelligence put forward over the last century, but three in particular have been widely accepted within society and academic communities. 

General Intelligence

First proposed by Charles Spearman in 1904, was the theory of a General Intelligence factor (g). Accepting that there are different types of intelligence, Dr Spearman suggested they are all correlated, so if you score well on a test of one, you will likely score well on all the others too. This was because these different types were all related to the single General Intelligence factor (g).

This model as subsequently developed by Raymond Cattell who split the ‘g’ factor into two components Fluid Intelligence (Gf) and Crystalised Intelligence (Gc).

Fluid intelligence is identified as the ability to solve problems in novel situations, independent of any acquired knowledge. Key Gf skills are logical analysis, pattern and relationship recognition and adaptability.

Crystallized intelligence, on the other hand is the ability to use skills, knowledge, and experience. Key Gc skills are accessing memories, a wide general knowledge base and articulate vocabulary. 

Theory of Multiple intelligences

Howard Gardner a Harvard Psychologist, proposed this alternative model in his 1983 book Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences.

Rather than a single general ‘intelligence’ there are eight distinct types of intelligence with no necessary correlation between them. 

This means just because an individual might perform well on a one test; say analytical intelligence for example, they could also perform badly on another, such as displaying poor emotional intelligence.

The eight types of intelligence under Gardner’s theory are: Spatial, Linguistic, Logical-mathematical, bodily-kinesthetic, musical, interpersonal, intrapersonal and naturalistic.

Since the original publication three further types have been suggested; existential, spiritual and moral intelligence. 

Triarchic Theory of Intelligence

Developed by Robert Sternberg in 1985, the Triarchic Theory of Intelligence takes a much broader view of intelligence. The starting point is that intelligence is defined as how well an individual deals with the environmental changes they experience throughout their lifespan.

Under the Triarchic model, intelligence are broken down into three subsets; analytical , creative and practical. These components are also known as; componential, experiential, and contextual

Analytical intelligence, refers to problem-solving abilities, Creative intelligence reflects the ability to deal with new situations using past experiences and current skills, and Practical intelligence is the ability to adapt to a changing environment. 

Conclusions

At present these and other competing theories of intelligence have yet to be reconciled into a single accepted theory. There is promise from some Neurobiological approaches such as P-Fit (Parieto-Frontal Integration Theory) proposed by Haier and Jung, that these different ideas may ultimately be shown to be complimentary descriptions.

Haier and Jung’s analysis of imaging studies attempting to locate brain regions involved in intelligence showed results are very similar regardless of the definition of intelligence used.

Even without a fully agreed theory, there are several features that all seem to share. These features equally cut to the heart of our intuitive idea of intelligence. Intelligence is a foundation for a wide variety of cognitive functions, skills and attributes. It is also the essence of problem solving, particularly where no prior knowledge or experience of the problem is available.